Abstract
While higher groupoids have a natural model in spaces, higher
categories have no such well-accepted model. This makes the question
of correctness of a given definition of higher categories difficult to
answer. We argue that the question has a simple answer "locally",
namely, categories are locally modelled on so-called manifold
diagrams. The corresponding "local model" for spaces/groupoids can be
formulated in classical terms by a generalised Thom-Pontryagin
construction. The idea of locally modelling higher categories by
manifold diagrams (most prominently in the case of Gray-categories) is
not new and has been proposed by multiple authors. However, the
niceness of this manifold-based perspective on higher categories has
been somewhat obfuscated by the complexity of manifold geometry in
higher dimensions in the past. Our work gives a fully algebraic
formulation of this manifold perspective. Interestingly, the model of
higher categories that is based on this algebraic formulation is not
fully weak: It is a generalisation of (unbiased) Gray-categories to
higher dimensions. This is the starting point of a wealth of further
research, which reaches from a (version of) Simpson's conjecture to
presentations of the extended cobordism n-category and the homotopy
and cobordism hypotheses.